<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Secrets of Effective Listening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/</link>
	<description>the blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-169</guid>
		<description>You would have thought that since I originated the quote while at Gartner, I would have gotten that right :)

Thanks for pointing it out.  It is true, sadly.  5% close the loop (inform people what they did with the feedback), but still I think it was 10-12% or so that acted on Feedback.  95% collected feedback, about half monitored it effectively over time, and just 10-12% actually did something... and even less told their customers what they did.

And, btw, even though that study is not some 2-3 years gold, things have changed slightly.  Still the 5% of closing the loop remains the same as it was, we just have higher numbers of people acting on it and monitoring effectively (I am going to have to track the new numbers and post an update.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would have thought that since I originated the quote while at Gartner, I would have gotten that right <img src='http://estebankolsky.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for pointing it out.  It is true, sadly.  5% close the loop (inform people what they did with the feedback), but still I think it was 10-12% or so that acted on Feedback.  95% collected feedback, about half monitored it effectively over time, and just 10-12% actually did something&#8230; and even less told their customers what they did.</p>
<p>And, btw, even though that study is not some 2-3 years gold, things have changed slightly.  Still the 5% of closing the loop remains the same as it was, we just have higher numbers of people acting on it and monitoring effectively (I am going to have to track the new numbers and post an update.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Israel</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Great post -- I&#039;m enjoying the blog.

One point...I think you might have misinterpreted the Gartner quote.  It&#039;s not that only 5% of companies act on the feedback.  The quote was that &quot;only 5 percent *inform customers* what they have done with that feedback&quot;.

Nearly all the companies we see respond fast to &quot;red flag&#039; feedback...but the best of them make a daily habit of touching base with the majority of respondents who are either mostly positive or exclusively positive.   IMO, this is what separates the greats from the goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8212; I&#8217;m enjoying the blog.</p>
<p>One point&#8230;I think you might have misinterpreted the Gartner quote.  It&#8217;s not that only 5% of companies act on the feedback.  The quote was that &#8220;only 5 percent *inform customers* what they have done with that feedback&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nearly all the companies we see respond fast to &#8220;red flag&#8217; feedback&#8230;but the best of them make a daily habit of touching base with the majority of respondents who are either mostly positive or exclusively positive.   IMO, this is what separates the greats from the goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Glenn,

Thanks for stopping by.  I could not agree with you more -- the purpose of listening is to try to resolve the problem and provide a solution.  The solution may not always be what the customer wants it to be - but if it is a fair solution and the customer feels we listened, we accomplished what we set out to do.  I do like the tip about body language... something that is discussed during call center training but most people quickly forget since they are not in a person-to-person setup.

Great tips, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.  I could not agree with you more &#8212; the purpose of listening is to try to resolve the problem and provide a solution.  The solution may not always be what the customer wants it to be &#8211; but if it is a fair solution and the customer feels we listened, we accomplished what we set out to do.  I do like the tip about body language&#8230; something that is discussed during call center training but most people quickly forget since they are not in a person-to-person setup.</p>
<p>Great tips, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the read (and the quote, will stop by tomorrow and read your blog in more detail, but it looks good from where I stand).

You&#039;d be surprised how many organizations have a hard time &quot;getting over themselves&quot; and working on a fix.  They don&#039;t think they have a problem to begin with -- that is the biggest problem.

And, I do agree with you, if you cannot admit the problem exists - you cannot fix it.

Thanks for the read!

&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the read (and the quote, will stop by tomorrow and read your blog in more detail, but it looks good from where I stand).</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be surprised how many organizations have a hard time &#8220;getting over themselves&#8221; and working on a fix.  They don&#8217;t think they have a problem to begin with &#8212; that is the biggest problem.</p>
<p>And, I do agree with you, if you cannot admit the problem exists &#8211; you cannot fix it.</p>
<p>Thanks for the read!</p>
<p>&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by brian_clark</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by brian_clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by brian_clark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by brian_clark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Good discussion, here.

On a personal level, listen with the intent to understand, not to argue. If you are meeting the person complaining in person, step out behind barriers such as desks and display cases. Watch your body language (relax).

I&#039;ll be reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion, here.</p>
<p>On a personal level, listen with the intent to understand, not to argue. If you are meeting the person complaining in person, step out behind barriers such as desks and display cases. Watch your body language (relax).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherrie Mersdorf</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherrie Mersdorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the same thing as John actually! I definitely didn&#039;t put it as eloquent  as he did though:

http://survey.cvent.com/blog/customer-service-feedback/0/0/are-you-a-good-listener-4-tips-to-better-listen-to-customer-feedback

I do think a lot of organizations need to &quot;get over themselves&quot; first and accept maybe they don&#039;t always know best, which is obviously the first (and maybe the most important) step. Otherwise, the rest of it is all for naught because they wont walk away with actionable items.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same thing as John actually! I definitely didn&#8217;t put it as eloquent  as he did though:</p>
<p><a href="http://survey.cvent.com/blog/customer-service-feedback/0/0/are-you-a-good-listener-4-tips-to-better-listen-to-customer-feedback" rel="nofollow">http://survey.cvent.com/blog/customer-service-feedback/0/0/are-you-a-good-listener-4-tips-to-better-listen-to-customer-feedback</a></p>
<p>I do think a lot of organizations need to &#8220;get over themselves&#8221; first and accept maybe they don&#8217;t always know best, which is obviously the first (and maybe the most important) step. Otherwise, the rest of it is all for naught because they wont walk away with actionable items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Thanks chuck,

Appreciate the follow and the read.

Esteban

&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks chuck,</p>
<p>Appreciate the follow and the read.</p>
<p>Esteban</p>
<p>&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by ahoojas</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by ahoojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-161</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by ahoojas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by ahoojas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/06/the-three-secrets-of-effective-listening/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=258#comment-160</guid>
		<description>John,  Excellent point, as usual.   I cannot emphasize enough what you just said. Root cause was hot for a few months last year and has pretty much dissapeared now, unfortunately. My feedback methodology focuses almost exclusively on that while doing point-of-service feedback escalation.   And that is why it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p> Excellent point, as usual. </p>
<p> I cannot emphasize enough what you just said. Root cause was hot for a few months last year and has pretty much dissapeared now, unfortunately. My feedback methodology focuses almost exclusively on that while doing point-of-service feedback escalation. </p>
<p> And that is why it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

