<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Two Loyalty Models Compared in a Nutshell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/</link>
	<description>the blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crm intelligence &#38; strategy @crm intelligence &#38; strategy</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>crm intelligence &#38; strategy @crm intelligence &#38; strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] what they want and take them. It&#8217;s very simple, people&#8217;s loyalty (in most cases just rational with few exceptions &#8212; see next point) are for purchase.  What&#8217;s that? You want an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what they want and take them. It&#8217;s very simple, people&#8217;s loyalty (in most cases just rational with few exceptions &#8212; see next point) are for purchase.  What&#8217;s that? You want an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loyalty, Love &#38; Sex Can Be Bought &#171; Fredzimny&#8217;s CCCCC Blog</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Loyalty, Love &#38; Sex Can Be Bought &#171; Fredzimny&#8217;s CCCCC Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] said before there are two types of loyalty, emotional and intellectual, and I now further that by saying that emotional loyalty is not an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said before there are two types of loyalty, emotional and intellectual, and I now further that by saying that emotional loyalty is not an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Friday Grab Bag &#8211; 05/15/2009 &#171; EKOLSKY &#8211; A Passion for Customer Service</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Friday Grab Bag &#8211; 05/15/2009 &#171; EKOLSKY &#8211; A Passion for Customer Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] Mondays &#8211; Why do you Want to be the Same Mediocre Loser?  Loyalty Tuesdays &#8211; The Two Loyalty Models Compared in a Nutshell  Relationships Wednesdays &#8211; Why Managing Experiences is Not a Technology, Nor a Strategy  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mondays &#8211; Why do you Want to be the Same Mediocre Loser?  Loyalty Tuesdays &#8211; The Two Loyalty Models Compared in a Nutshell  Relationships Wednesdays &#8211; Why Managing Experiences is Not a Technology, Nor a Strategy  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Kolsky</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Kolsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-39</guid>
		<description>@Todd,

I think you are right on your definition for intellectual CRM, but it is somewhat easier to move into emotional CRM - add CEM.  I did not say a slam-dunk, but if you have your CRM and personalized relationships under control, then adding CEM is simply a matter of building the strategy and continuing what you are doing.  It should be a natural progression.  Most companies, however, falter at the thought.  They get confused thinking it is another major undertaking, isolated from CRM and previous implementations.  Too bad, it would make a significant difference.

@Sherrie,
Great question.  I think the answer is partly on the size, partly on the mess of internal systems they have.  They can listen, heck - anyone can listen, but they cannot act.  They either have not empowered the people in the frontline to act, or they don&#039;t have the right systems to take on it (think about a mega telephone provider that grew through acquisitions - how can they take all their systems and data and integrate one more thing into it without going crazy?  SOA and cloud is the future, but today they are stuck where they are).  Also, think about the ability to personalize millions of interaction daily so you can customize experiences and build that bond... the few that tried are still trying to recover from their previous attempts.

I think technology will make a difference, but we are some 3-5 years out.  Then, we can have this conversation again and probably say different things.

Thanks for your comments, and for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd,</p>
<p>I think you are right on your definition for intellectual CRM, but it is somewhat easier to move into emotional CRM &#8211; add CEM.  I did not say a slam-dunk, but if you have your CRM and personalized relationships under control, then adding CEM is simply a matter of building the strategy and continuing what you are doing.  It should be a natural progression.  Most companies, however, falter at the thought.  They get confused thinking it is another major undertaking, isolated from CRM and previous implementations.  Too bad, it would make a significant difference.</p>
<p>@Sherrie,<br />
Great question.  I think the answer is partly on the size, partly on the mess of internal systems they have.  They can listen, heck &#8211; anyone can listen, but they cannot act.  They either have not empowered the people in the frontline to act, or they don&#8217;t have the right systems to take on it (think about a mega telephone provider that grew through acquisitions &#8211; how can they take all their systems and data and integrate one more thing into it without going crazy?  SOA and cloud is the future, but today they are stuck where they are).  Also, think about the ability to personalize millions of interaction daily so you can customize experiences and build that bond&#8230; the few that tried are still trying to recover from their previous attempts.</p>
<p>I think technology will make a difference, but we are some 3-5 years out.  Then, we can have this conversation again and probably say different things.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments, and for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherrie Mersdorf</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherrie Mersdorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I agree with the previous comment - it&#039;s the bigger companies that disappoint.

It makes me wonder, is that because they&#039;ve gotten too big to listen (and possibly don&#039;t know how to adjust to this new world where knowledge is shared so freely and quickly!) and think they can do whatever they want because they&#039;re bigger than me?  Small organizations have a lot more to lose when they lose one customer, and they tend to be better at creating a bond when working with you.

So the question is, if all companies are small at one point (because they had to have been once) where does the disconnect happen to move from having emotional loyalty to intellectual loyalty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the previous comment &#8211; it&#8217;s the bigger companies that disappoint.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder, is that because they&#8217;ve gotten too big to listen (and possibly don&#8217;t know how to adjust to this new world where knowledge is shared so freely and quickly!) and think they can do whatever they want because they&#8217;re bigger than me?  Small organizations have a lot more to lose when they lose one customer, and they tend to be better at creating a bond when working with you.</p>
<p>So the question is, if all companies are small at one point (because they had to have been once) where does the disconnect happen to move from having emotional loyalty to intellectual loyalty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tboehm30</title>
		<link>http://estebankolsky.com/2009/05/the-two-loyalty-models-compared-in-a-nutshell/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>tboehm30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekolsky.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-37</guid>
		<description>If you treat all customers the best you can, give them your honest price, with as much CRM as you can afford, then I suppose that would be intellectual loyalty.

It is the bigger companies where you just expect more that disappoints you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you treat all customers the best you can, give them your honest price, with as much CRM as you can afford, then I suppose that would be intellectual loyalty.</p>
<p>It is the bigger companies where you just expect more that disappoints you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

